Film Reviews by IW

Welcome to IW's film reviews page. IW has written 3 reviews and rated 11 films.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

The Great Gatsby

Overdone in all respects

(Edit) 22/09/2022

If you're going to go to the trouble of remaking a film, the least you can do is to bring something worthwhile and valuable to the process. This version is a horrendously self-indulgent vehicle for OTT special effects, some distinctly weird music choices (rap in the 1920's??) and some serious under-performances from the actors - and to what end? What on earth did the makers think they were adding to the previous versions - (had they even read the book?).

Don't waste your time on it! 

0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Pixar Short Films Collection: Vol.3

Not up to scratch

(Edit) 07/03/2019

Pixar have made many brilliant films over the years, and putting their name to this very largely (with a mere 2 exceptions) self-indulgent and unoriginal collection of shorts is a mistake.

Many of the films are as cringe-worthy as the director's introduction that precedes them.

Pixar, please don't bother with collection 4!

0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.

Write your review

100 characters remaining
4000 characters remaining

See our review guidelines and terms.

Forever Love

Trade Description Act Scandal

(Edit) 24/01/2017

I am convinced that somewhere in the advertising blurb the implication was that this film was enjoyable to watch and even a tiny bit positive.

Well, the lighting was terrific and the camera angles were pretty good ... The acting wasn't bad either - so what's the problem?

Plot, over use of flashbacks, general air of depression and fatalism, lack of apparent connection between the supposedly romantic leads ...

I couldn't finish watching it, with the only excitement being whether boredom or confusion was the most dominant factor.

0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.