Film Reviews by NK

This looked like it had been made for an old TV series like Thriller. The protagonist doesn't really give you much reason to care about her and, if there is any kind of sinister threat, it's so subtle that I didn't really notice it. I only kept watching because it was an opportunity to practice my German.

Not as good as the first one. The constant bickering between the two sisters ("You left me behind! I begged you not to go!" etc) gets tiresome very quickly, but it's enjoyable enough.

A boring story, with an even more tedious backstory, featuring a completely unlikeable protagonist. There's nothing here that you won't have seen before and done much better. I was dubious about it from the start but I thought that at least it's a French film so if nothing else I can improve my French - but no, the unlikeable heroine is a bratty American and it's all in English (I suppose that's a plus if you don't like subtitles). It's only 80 minutes long, but that's way too long for me.

A short film about nothing very much at all. The fact that the communist authorities decided it must therefore be subversive in some way speaks to me more to their paranoia about someone clever putting something past them and making them look silly because they didn't get the joke, than anything much to do with the actual content in this odd little film.

As others have already stated, the film is much much longer than the stated 106 minute run time on the DVD sleeve - don't make the mistake I made by starting to watch it late in the evening.

This is a very complicated story, involving lots and lots of characters, and it's not very well told. The action flits back and forth between different locations, so you're not sure whether you're back in Sicily, or still in Rio de Janeiro, or Rome or Florida, or somewhere else. It includes lots of flashbacks so you're not sure where you are in the narrative, and it involves so many people that it's hard to keep track of who they are. You never really spend enough time with any of them to care anyway. It was a disappointment for me.

***THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS***
Fairly routine zombie romp with a set-piece Hollywood-style cliche for a plot - the hero has to travel across country to rescue his son who’s staying with his grandparents. He meets a few disposable allies on the way who help out then wind up dead.
The zombies are of the ‘28 Days Later’ variety, i.e. infected people who have gone berserk and can run very fast, as opposed to the shuffling ‘Walking Dead’ variety who are actually dead.
Switch off your brain and enjoy!
Unlike most apocalyptic mass infection movies, this one has a happy ending.

If you like your early 80’s synth music then you’ll like this.
There doesn’t seem to be an option for subtitles on the copy I received. You can either watch it in the original German or dubbed into English.

This is an absurdist comedy/drama set in an office building where total chaos reigns. Everyone is always in the wrong place because someone keeps taking away the signs. And everybody just happens to be naked - not just in the office, but in their whole world, the police who arrest their boss are naked, the people they see on television are naked etc. Their nudity is never commented on, although they make the same kinds of remarks about people's figures, weight loss/gain as anywhere else. This is also a transgressive film because it breaks some sort of Hollywood golden rule that anyone seen naked or partially naked has to be young, slim and beautiful - these are just normal people. And everyone smokes too.

This movie has obviously been transferred to DVD from a 3rd or 4th copy of a VHS tape, so the sound and picture quality is poor. The film simply consists of a series of interviews with women who performed in low budget, straight-to-video horror movies in the 1980s, interspersed with the odd clip from one of their old movies.
The actors only talk about their own careers so it’s not particularly interesting to the casual viewer.
I gave up about halfway through.

This movie is shot in a kind of hyper-real style using sound stages rather than locations, so it looks a lot more like a play than a movie. Dialogue is in English. If you're a fan of Derek Jarman-style homoeroticism then this is for you.

It's difficult to go into any detail about this story without dropping spoilers. All I will say is that it's about real people trying to deal with a very real situation.

This film is based on some weird macho Christian morality which will particularly grate with non-American audiences (and probably a lot of Americans too). Apparently, if you see two strangers fighting (or, to be fair in this case, a total stranger being beaten up by another total stranger) then if you don't intervene you're a "coward" who deserves to be named and shamed on TV and spat at in the street. Never mind that you could end up dead, or in prison, or protecting a very bad person because you've misread the narrative, never mind that most police forces would advise you not to get involved in a brawl, however one-sided it might seem. And if you video the incident, however useful that footage might be to the police to identify the perpetrator or perhaps cause the perpetrator to pause and reconsider his actions when he notices he's being filmed - that's just another act of cowardice as far as this twisted movie is concerned. Add in a double heaped spoonful of saccharine-soaked tears and lots of "I love you so much!" and this piece of crap is what you're left with.

*** THIS REVIEW CONTAINS SPOILERS *** A fairly unlikeable protagonist is having an affair with the wife of his best/only friend and strangles her to death during a bout of rough sex. The police only seen to carry out the most cursory investigation, but our hero is wracked with guilt. He confesses, first to his wife and then to his friend (the cuckolded husband). They both seem OK with it. The end.

I stuck with this film right to the end, mainly out of nostalgia - it reminded me of the trashy 'B' movies my friends and I used to see on the late show at the local flea pit. The scenery is quite stunning and, as a teenager, I know I would have enjoyed all the footage of our heroes riding their trail bikes through the wilderness (accompanied by banjo/fiddle music) and getting into scrapes with local hillbillies and law enforcement. The plot is quite lame, the sort of thing you'd expect on an episode of The Dukes of Hazzard, albeit with a deadlier outcome. The action scenes are unconvincing, especially (spoiler alert!) when the hero gets shot several times but just walks it off.

The sound quality is dreadful. I can't tell if it has just deteriorated with age, although I suspect it was never very good. Half the time you can't hear what people are saying, although from context you can tell that they're probably not saying anything that matters much.

I won't be going out of my way to watch any more of William Grefe's output.

I like the idea of a film that transforms the myth of the vampire into a powerful metaphor for bloodthirsty fascism, with Dracula as the dictator who feeds on his people. That's certainly a metaphor we can relate to in 21st Century Britain where obscenely wealthy vampiric oligarchs suck huge amounts of money out of the economy into their bloated offshore tax havens, whilst ordinary people suffer cuts to vital services and sink into poverty and destitution. I didn't see that metaphor here though. Franco's censors would have had to have been sensitive to the point of paranoia to see any implied criticism of their government in this footage. It's basically outtakes from the making of the classic Dracula movie, shown in chronological sequence, with either no sound or inappropriate sound, like the Victorian funeral where a jet can be heard passing noisily overhead.

This film might be of a certain specialist interest, but I don't really think it's for general entertainment.