Film Reviews by CH

There is much to enjoy in this film, which changes gear in the middle to embrace enigma, and yet, as a whole is is not that enjoyable. Which character is each of the two of them assuming from scene to scene, and even within scenes? Unreliable narrators are all very well, but the film feels like a latercomer to post-modernism (with a glossy hue). That said, other people have enjoyed its take upon the tropes of European film. A writer, a restaurant, an art gallery, a hillside: you get the picture. Well, at least a Marvel character does not loom from within a public statue in a square.

The threat of nuclear war appeared in many films in the Fifties and Sixties, perhaps beginning with Seven Days Till Noon (1950). An unsual take on this is Nigel Kneale's The Crunch (1963), whose fifty minutes turn around a former colony's embassy threatening to detonate the bomb which has been created in its London basement.

England has a sober Prime Minister while the colony has a beserk President who is kept in check, almost, by an Ambassador.

Preposterous, but, as usually ther case with Kneale's work, one is carred along. Here is a corner of a deserted London with car horns parping throughout offscreen while the Prime Minister sits it out with the Army and Police while tanks are to the ready (although one is left to wonder what these could do).

Dark-hued, dense, it is involving - even if a late turn remains puzzlingly fantastic -, and leaves one eager for the later films on this disc. One of them at a time feels best.

Diverting enough, a simple story stretched across several years with an interval during which young lovers are parted by an ocean and then chance upon one another again in a Paris which seems to spring from other films as much as the place itself. Without the btio of the best of the nouvelle vague, it does not immerse one in the characters' lives, one can look away wgile being drawn back. Intelligently done, and something for ninety minutes when one is not in the spirit for something demanding.

As others have said, a tremendous film. It is worth adding that the disc contains several extras, including films on which Dickinson worked about Spain and the Civil War. It is a shame that he did not make more films. There is a very good collection of essays about him edited by Philip Horne whose other great subject is... Henry James.

As the previous review says, this is dubbed, though it is not the worst instance I have seen/heard of that. I think the original can be bought in a new edition. Although the film is sometimes called an epic, and it is widescreen with some highly-populated scenes as troops mobilise, it is essentially a chamber drama with large and small interiors as the factions vie with one another, and treason looms. Do see it.

Three very different Maugham stories, each with a twist neatly done, and all excellently characterised. The longest is Sanatorium in which an ailing Ashenden visits the eponymous establishment - somewhere in remote Scotland - and finds himself amidst people who have elected to stay on even though they appear the picture of health (after a fashion). Amongst the yoinger residents/patients are Michael Rennie and Jean Simmons whose walk in the woods becomes, for some, the stuff of scandal. Much recommended, all three, as a way to round off an evening.

Mention films that involve boxing, and one can be sure that certain titles are immediately mentioned. Among them is unlikely to be The Extra Day (1956) but its longest scene is a boxing match in which one of the participants is none other than Sid James. He is not only involved in a racket but the incident is a link with this being another film about filming.

Written and directed by William Fairchild, it turns around the final reel of a film being lost as it tumbles from a van between the set and the studio. Needs must, the choleric émigré director (Laurence Naismith) determines to round up the main cast and the others which makes for a punning title about another day’s shooting.

This sounds like a routine, even whimsical English comedy, but the cast, which also includes Bryan Forbes, Beryl Reid, Jill Bennett, Joan Hickson and Simone Simon, make much of the diverse plot lines which such a set-up involves as it moves between the fraught and the comic from moment to moment. There are continual surprises, the effect is far more surreal than one might expect at first - and room much be found for Dennis Lotis. In his time, pre-Cliff, he had become a good-looking figure on the English musical scene with a vocal style which owed something to Sinatra. Here he is the object of a Fan Club which goes wild in a way that anticipates Beatlemania (among them Beryl Reid). And he died only this year, at ninety-three, after a life whose turns could make for an enjoyable documentary if not a full-blown biopic.

Well worth your time.

Incomplete works, whether on the page, canvas or as sculpture, can have as much fascination as those deemed finished (if anything ever is).

At an hour long, Passenger is but a fragment of what it could have been, and the missing scenes are mainly, one infers, those to have been filmed upon a boat some time after a guard and prisoner - both women - had become embroiled in a Polish death camp. The shipboard sequences, for which stills are supplied, provide a counterpoint to a brilliantly and harrowingly re-creation of a camp (beds which are but holes in a wall, for example) at the evil heart of the Holcaust. The relationship, the taunts, the forced marches to the ovens: these have, of course, become familiar but Passenger - such an innocent-seeming, nautical title - also does service to describe those who made a one-way journey, their ticket marked Oblivion.

There is no film like this, and it should be better known.

Here is a diverting film. If not exactly the comedy for which Doris Day is best known, this take on early-Sixties London, as known to those who are not only well-heeled but high-heeled, it comes with the sinister matter of her being pursued by anonymous telephone calls which threaten the worst. Not as frightening as this could be, some way after Gaslight, there are so many good roles - not least a welcome appearance by Myrna Loy - that one accepts it all gratefully.

This is another highly enjoyable one by Zeman, even if it is slightly too long and is more a series of imaginative vignettes than an overarching narrative. Magical, the way in which film and animation combine. There is nothing to match this. Watch it to savour the heading I have given this review.

This film cannot match the 1941 novel on which it is based but, in the Buchan/Hitchcock way of a man caught up in more than he expected, it is diverting. With a surprside appearance by... Thora Hird.

The last of the films which Marlene made with Von Sternberg is patchy, partly told in long flashbacks by one of the men whom she has led astray. It does not draw one in, although there are many moments in which one can relish the command of light and shadow. The previous one, The Scarlet Empress, is as preposterous but rather more beguiling.

An extra with the disc includes one of its makers saying at the time that it could not have been created six motnhs earlier. Now that computerised "effects" are everyday, and so often dull, in films, it is heartening to go back to this pioneer of them and find wit and ingenuity bearing upon a story and characters, including a dog who was ahead of The Artist, which are geuininely involving.

Made in 1934, this take on Catherine ll sneaked in ahead of the Code, which means that not only does Marlene have a romp in the hay (interrupted by a horse) but there is a brief shot of a clock at the Court which contains a figure in an overcoat who flashes on the hour. The pervasive American accents add to the hokum, along with somebody drilling a spyhole through the eye of a portrait while the backs of chairs sport goulish sculpted figures. And yet it has to be seen for, at quite a clip, all this is pervafed by von Sternberg's Expressionist past in Germany: light and shade, tolling bells in close up, crowds surging across the open land and these Imperial buildings - not to mention a montage of executions in the opening minute.

Magical. The word has become overused, but there is no other adjective for Karel Zeman’s Invention for Destruction (1958). To describe it is to convey only a part of the effect it has. This is far from the routine would-be thrills of those who try to adapt Jules Verne. In this case, a lesser-known novel provides the background in which a gang of pirates, who operating from a hidden cave, have as part of their fleet a submarine. This plys a fish-laden ocean bed from which it rises to plunge into the hull of many a ship so that, as those crews drown, men in suitable suits emerge from the submersible to requisition trunkloads of treasure.

Add to this a beautiful surviving young woman and a kidnapped inventor, and you might imagine the hand of Hammer.

But no, Zeman’s work comprises animation, hand-drawn backgrounds sometimes traversed by a human cast which, now and then, morphs into stop-go techniques, all of which had an effect upon, among others, Terry Gilliam.

When the world has staled of computer-generated imagery, it will return to the sheer beauty of something which time and again has one going “wow!” - not least when an octopus does its stuff.

Never has black and white been so colourful.