Gosh, this was a slog.
I was very annoyed by the vague historical setting, though the Inclosure Act led to events like this from around 1600 for 300 years.
Yet again, colourblind casting nonsense raises its ugly head - in 1939 there were just 6000 black people in a UK of 44 million, so how is it appropriate to featured 4 black people in a tiny village from centuries ago? As absurd as Lady Macbeth and other British films which do this, no doubt to tick dem EDI diversity boxes to be eligible for a BAFTA. WOULD it be seen as good to cast 'white' actors or Chinese ones as African warriors of the past, Zulus maybe? Of course not - the moral compass swings to the polar opposite for ANY drama set in Asia/Africa EVEN on the radio and EVEN for fantasies like the Lion King and Black Panther - but then all actors must be of colour as AUTHENTIC CASTING is demanding. Be consistent - do authentic casting for British/European stories too. It's all actually racism and deeply silly, People need to grow up & get real.
I hate using this word ever, but what this film is - is BORING. Annoying too, in its amorphous vagueness of time and place. It sometimes resembles a preachy sermonising political lecture, which reveals the authors very leftwing leanings - which is fine. But so much of this film seems to be bullying the viewer into cheering for the poor oppressed folk (NB MOST people were oppressed in the past everywhere in the world, including 'white' males who had no privilege whatsoever in the main).
It's based on a novel by Jim Crace I have not read but it was shortlisted for the Booker prize; I did like his short 2nd novel The Gift of Stones, fascinating glimpse into the transition between the Stone Age and the Bronze Age.
2 stars. Just.