Film Reviews by Steve

Comedy-drama based on William Faulkner's novel set in the American south of distant memory. A car is delivered to a rich family in a small rural town in Mississippi. Steve McQueen and Rupert Crosse play stable boys who 'borrow' the vehicle and drive the family's 11 year old boy (Mitch Vogel) to Memphis where bawdy adventures take place and life-lessons are learned.  

The narrator (Burgess Meredith) declares that the citizens of his youth were a 'pleasant courteous people'. This was a time of apartheid, religious fundamentalism and awful inequality! There is racism in the film (and free use of racist expletives) though it is stripped of menace. There are rednecks, a stupid fat sheriff, ribald sex workers... all the archetypes of southern comedy.

Perhaps this nostalgic idealisation of the past is more credible because it is a memory film. The suffering has been forgotten. If that hurdle can be overcome, and McQueen's rather grotesque, broad caricature, then there is a warm coming of age story set in the endless summers of all our pasts.

The photography is beautiful. There is a folksy score by John Williams, all banjos and fiddles, and a sentimental orchestral theme for those special moments. There is a sense of the past being a place of safety and childhood a time of adventure. Which has a certain innocent, naive charm. 

A strong candidate for writer-director Val Guest's best film. It's a police procedural about an investigation into a dismembered corpse which is found in a holiday home in a rather seedy postwar Brighton- based on a real life incident.

The detectives on the case are the sagacious, weary veteran Jack Warner, assisted by Ronald Lewis who does most of the leg work. They are a wonderful duo and handle the constant flow of dialogue with finesse. There are rich supporting performances all the way down the cast list.

There is a real flair to this film, with its credible and compelling screenplay, but mostly because of the sinuous, lively gaze of the camera, particularly during the examination of the murder scene. The neglected splendour of Brighton and Lewes and the big skies of the coastal suburbs convey a delightful melancholy.

All this is created with a crew who usually worked on Hammer productions, and without any incidental music at all. OK, Val Guest ended up making a Confessions film, and Space 1999, but at his peak he was a significant talent in postwar UK cinema. This is a classic British noir.

Orson Welles' legendary debut is the most analysed and critically revered film ever made. Charles Foster Kane is plucked from obscurity by a quirk of fate and becomes an immensely wealthy media baron. But the real Kane is so barely known that on his death his own newspaper launches an investigation into his life , and the meaning of his final word: Rosebud.  

The character is based on news tycoon William Randolph Hearst, but clearly also on Welles himself. The director arrived in Hollywood at 25 claiming to know nothing about the business, which is exactly how Kane announces himself on acquiring the National Inquirer newspaper. And at that age.

 This is a visually stunning film with Gregg Toland's glorious photography, and Welles' artistic visual imagination. Herman Mankiewicz and Welles' scenario is inventive and insightful and the dialogue laconic and witty. The performances have an offbeat quality out of step with forties Hollywood. It hums with the energy of innovation.  

Welles' classic is insightful on the dark arts of politics and capitalism and the men who succeed in those fields.  Both the film and Kane have become mythic creations. In our present era of populist/authoritarian leaders, Citizen Kane remains as relevant as it did in 1941. 

Leisurely rural drama set in the Australian bush which owes plenty to the American western but captures enough local culture and landscape to maintain a separate identity. The roving inhabitants of the outback are colourful, though perhaps it's an idealised portrayal of these characters and their far flung settlements.

The setting appears realistic. The costumes and interiors don't feel cleaned up at all.  The terrain is shot on location and the story is drawn from life. In fact the narrative feels like reportage: the 2-up, the bushfires, the sheep shearing contest and the horse racing.  

The performances of Robert Mitchum and, especially, Deborah Kerr are surprisingly authentic. They are a married couple working as drovers, steering sheep between the country towns of Jindabyne and Cawndilla. She and their son want to buy a farm and settle down but he wants to carry on drifting.

There is fine ensemble support from familiar British and Australian character actors (including Chips Rafferty). Most of all, there is an impression of the vastness of the Australian interior, and its people. Of rural loneliness and the vulnerability of isolation, but also of a resilient frontier spirit. 

Faithful version of Tennessee Williams' unsuccessful 1957 play Orpheus Descending, itself patterned on the classical myth. It is an ominous tale full of raw symbolism. For those who enjoy Williams' sad poetry and empathise with his world view, this is a treat. And the dialogue is very quotable.

Marlon Brando delivers a stoned performance as a beautiful nonconformist who blows into a southern town in thrall to racism and violence, and which conceals a guilty secret. The drifter becomes the lover of the suffering wife (Anna Magnani) of a violent, dying bigot.  

It is an allegory about purity and corruption. The capitalist world is intrinsically unholy, where human souls are bought and sold. Only the artist can be free of this contamination and become celestial. Like the visionary painter (Maureen Stapleton) or the newcomer, a free spirit whose guitar is inscribed by the great singers of the blues.

 It is the imagery that matters. The hero wears a snakeskin jacket which denotes he is a wild thing, and which he sheds at the end to become a relic that inspires future disciples.  There is an abundance of abstract talk and little plot. It fared poorly, falling between the eras of the Beats and the Hippies, who may have embraced this cryptic parable.

Heartbreaker updated from Lillian Hellman's 1934 play about two female teachers who are destroyed when a young student falsely accuses them of being lovers. The girl who makes up the lie out of spite (Karen Balkin) is a convincing villain and the rich, small town bigots who victimise the friends are a sinister and vengeful mob. 

Audrey Hepburn is fine as a rather pristine schoolmistress who is deprived of her planned marriage by the gossip. But Shirley MacLaine is the heart of the film, as a kind of soul mate unaware she really is a lesbian. The child''s malicious lie is a scandal, but the teacher's ignorance of her sexualty is a tragedy.

Shirley MacLaine is magnificent. Her performance cuts so deep- not so much her anguish in confronting this fundamental truth about herself, but because she sees her true identity as degenerate and unendurable. Her pain is so pitiful. By killing herself, she sets her friend free, which I suppose is the ultimate expression of love. The climax is truly devastating.

This was still a controversial story in 1961 and time hasn't dulled its impact. Homosexuality is no longer scandalous, but these emotions are still in play. And the capacity for onlookers to cheapen, malign and offend is greater than ever. It's an emotional powerhouse, which features one of the great performances. And an example of William Wyler's cinematic artistry.

This has an aura of nocturnal transience. Strangers cross paths in bus stations, hotels, waiting rooms and pool halls. It traps these nightflies in the frame of its b&w photography, in its noirish lighting, its urban set design and authentic pool hall locations. It is realistic, yet as poignantly mythic as an Edward Hopper painting.

Most of all it catches the essence of this world in its ill-fated anti-hero, the pool shark Fast Eddie Felson who must overcome personal tragedy to beat Minnesota Fats (Jackie Gleason) in an epic contest at the Ames Pool Hall. Eddie is brilliantly inhabited by Paul Newman with huge intensity and charisma and sadness.

 Newman and Piper Laurie as his lonely, aimless, alcoholic lover are extremely affecting together, captured in the deep, narrow spaces of her apartment. George C. Scott is tough and intimidating as Eddie's manager who shows the hustler how much of himself he has to sell in order to succeed.

The film is all atmosphere. The scenes develop at leisure, assembling the strangers in a sort of ceremony in the pool rooms as the night settles in and the hustle begins. The pessimistic script sounds like beat poetry. Some of the dialogue is thrilling. So lovely, so full of sorrow. 

Perhaps the ultimate triumph of the Hollywood studio system. It wasn't a prestige project. No one knew they were making a classic. But because Warner Brothers had great salaried talent to call on, they transformed an unproduced one act play set in Casablanca during WWII, into something enduring and universal.  

It lacks realism, but it feels true. During the cathartic scene when the refugees of many countries sing La Marseillaise in Rick's cafe to drown out the Germans' anthem, the cast and extras were in tears for real. Many of them really were fugitives from the Nazis. Humphrey Bogart and Dooley Wilson are the only American actors.  

What gives the work cohesion is Max Steiner's famous score and Julius and Philip Epstein's legendary script. What exalts the film is the compelling romance between Rick (Bogart) and Ilsa (Ingrid Berman). She gives the film so much of its emotional intensity, he delivers the sassy humour and famous epigrams with immortal cool.

Maybe the well known production complications contributed to the impression of a precarious world. Casablanca could have been just another film on the Warner's roster. But it is loved, because it captures a sensation of the uncertainty of exile at crossroads in history while touching our hearts and giving us faith in a greater good.

Tennessee Williams' classic of American theatre was adapted for the screen by its stage producer Elia Kazan with reluctance as he felt he had achieved as much as he could with the play on Broadway. It was controversial in New York- in Hollywood, it was a scandal. But, despite the censorship problems, the play survives remarkably intact.

This was the first Hollywood film to feature a jazz soundtrack. Some of it was suppressed for being too sexy! Language and insinuation formed battle lines. While the play is about changes in the American South and the precariousness of enlightenment, it is just as true to say it is about Williams' own heart. He felt violated by the furore.

Kazan took three of his main players with him to Warner Brothers: Karl Malden, Kim Hunter-who is superb- and Marlon Brando. And Brando was a sensation. We'll never know what a shock his performance must have been. Nothing like it had been on the screen before. It's crazy he didn't win the Oscar.

The three other stars did, including Vivien Leigh as the ethereal, vulnerable Blanche. Her and Brando's scenes together are extraordinary. They made two of the great dramatic roles their own. Blanche's fight for survival is a heartbreaker. And she becomes an exotic figure of southern gothic, destroyed by the way the world changes. 

This looks back to Howard Hawks' pre-code film, The Dawn Patrol, which was about WWI flyers and their response to the seeming inevitability of death.  Their survival under pressure forms a bond and an unshakeable code. And it also looks forward to Casablanca whose romance is very similar.      

These men deliver the mail in the fog over the Andes. But they will transit anything, including nitroglycerine! Cary Grant is the boss who hires a flyer now married to the only woman he ever cared about... And the new man is reckoned to have once bailed out of a crash which killed his co-pilot... thus breaking the code.  

This is Cary Grant's first really successful dramatic role. And it is Rita Hayworth's breakout from support parts in B films. Both are excellent. Two out of three ain't bad; Jean Arthur is badly cast as the showgirl interloper who stumbles on this exotic other world.  

There's shadows and fog,  and life threatening heroics with plenty of action and a lot of fast, tough crosstalk. There's a gallery of mavericks who turn up on a mountain in South America determined to get the mail out, no matter what. These are the thematic threads that Hawks would weave over his career, creating a kind of genre of his own.

This is set in a small town in early twentieth century Alabama where little has changed since the civil war. It is a poor community, of low wage workers and racial apartheid, which is resistant to change. The southern aristocracy has atrophied and the new money of American capitalists is about to feed on the corpse of the confederacy.  

The adaptation of Lillian Hellman's play is set almost entirely in a single house. As a woman, Bette Davis' matriarch has to fight for wealth through her husband (Herbert Marshall). He has grown tired of exploiting the weak and is terminally sick. But the wife and her brothers need his money to secure a deal which will make them very rich.

 This is a fascinating film of the decline of a corrupt tradition about to be consumed by the wealth of the few. They are all avaricious monsters who howl and tear at each other as much as those they exploit. Davis is impassive behind her mask of white paint, which conceals her tawdry appetites and sordid ambitions. 

It is specifically about the deep south, which would dominate Hollywood drama in the middle of the century. Hellman's writing is more precise than the poetics of her contemporaries. This is a frank exposure of the physical and emotional violence hidden in domesticity and a society where southern gentility is merely a strategy.

Film historians routinely tell us that during the Great Depression, audiences turned to screwball comedy and musicals for diversion. Sure they did, but they also made hits out of The Grapes of Wrath and this, Pearl Buck's huge epic of Chinese feudal poverty.

It's the story of a woman sold into slavery as a child during a famine and her struggle to endure a proud husband, a hostile environment and an oppressive aristocracy. Luise Rainer gives one of the most moving of all cinema performances as a pragmatic, brutalised, determined survivor. Paul Muni is convincing as her vain, impulsive husband.  

This is a huge spectacle, with vast scenes of revolution. The people are chattels, owned by the rich, and destitute women suffer most of all because they are possessed by their husbands. Wealth is hoarded by the few and the poor are blown about by the winds of history just as the deadly locusts are by capricious thermals.  

It is long and slow, but hypnotic. The realism is horrifying at times, like the period when the family survives by eating earth and the husband sifts the soil for roots. There is also a suggestion that the wife kills one of her babies. There is a little hope at the climax. It's the incredible hardship and hunger that linger in the mind.

This is the best of the many end of the world films made during the cold war. Its premise is that the accumulation of nuclear weapons will inevitably lead to their deployment which will potentially end human life. And we get the pleasure of listening to Fred Astaire explain the concept of mutually assured destruction!  

Gregory Peck plays a buttoned down submarine Commander unable to articulate the pain of losing his family. He eventually falls in love with a party girl (Ava Gardner) who is drinking to forget. They meet in Melbourne in the last inhabitable city on earth, waiting for the winds to bring the fatal radiation.

The film delivers its anti-nuclear message clear and stark. We are less moved by the two stars finding solace in the path of inevitable death, than the premonition of the destruction of ourselves. Stanley Kramer is critical of the forces that divide us, including class and religion, as well as the nationalism that provokes the war.  

The production utilises its Australian locations evocatively, the black and white photography is beautiful and there is a quite superb script in which people communicate through implication and evasion. It is a study of how people behave when there is no hope left. 

 The action explodes into life as a speeding train delivers a one-armed war veteran (Spencer Tracy) to a remote desert town to take a medal to the father of a Japanese soldier killed in WWII.  Tracy discovers this farmer was murdered by one of the locals and the crime covered up.

The suspense never really eases off. But what makes the introduction (scored with great vigour by André Previn) so stunning is the artistic spectacle of the Cinemascope-plus the gorgeous colour- which captures the epic grandeur of the Mojave Desert and its great white sky.

The film is set in '46 and seeks rapprochement for the victimisation of Japanese citizens in the US after Pearl Harbour. It warns of the consequences of hate. A man is violently killed for his race. And the disabled veteran is next. No stranger was ever made less welcome. 

Spencer Tracy leads effectively, but the film is carried by its all time great support cast of western rednecks: Robert Ryan, Ernest Borgnine, Lee Marvin, Walter Brennan. The sense of threat is very potent. We empathise  so completely with Tracy's outsider/victim that it makes the anti-racism of the story's message extremely powerful.   

Short and very sweet musical fairytale set in France after WWII, but really an idealised provincial fantasy town of button shops and circuses. Leslie Caron stars as a homeless orphan who joins a carnival and falls in love with a philandering magician while distantly admired by Mel Ferrer's inhibited, saturnine  puppeteer.  

As common with folktales, the story conceals a trauma. We never discover what past sorrow causes Lili to retreat in her mind to a make believe world of puppets, but its burden is palpable. Ferrer was disabled in an accident, but there is also an impression he remains distressed by the war. And the film acutely captures the pain of unrequited love.

 OK, Leslie Caron played many gamine ingenues in her career and Lili is that persona pushed to its extreme. But she is very moving as we watch her mature from shunned waif to a beautiful girl with a trusting but discerning heart. It is a story of wish-fulfilment, of a child learning how to love and becoming a woman.  

The puppets and the carnival world are wonderfully realised. The photography is lovely, with the primary colours of the sunny days absorbed into the inky blues of night. It is a whimsical, enchanting and optimistic film where virtue triumphs over cynicism.