Ideological and passionate
- The Wind That Shakes the Barley review by Tim from London
This film is fully committed to the director's political stance on Ireland - and this is both its great strength and its main flaw. On the one hand it is gripping and driven and the sheer force of the conviction makes this a compelling film. However like many Ken Loach films it is very one sided and lacks subtlety - eg all English people are either toffs or thugs and even the IRA soldiers who supported the treaty are viewed negatively. However on balance I would highly recommend this film if nothing else for its highly committed ideological stance.
5 out of 8 members found this review helpful.
Flawed but worth seeing
- The Wind That Shakes the Barley review by Pete W
A film worth seeing - it explores the political situation in Ireland in the 1920s with a war of independence against the British turning into a civil war. The film has a very definite political bias towards the non-Treaty IRA and against the English and the Free Staters. A more even handed approach might have made for a more gripping drama.
4 out of 5 members found this review helpful.
A film to watch
- The Wind That Shakes the Barley review by CP Customer
this is a true to life thought provoking film, with a well written script and superb acting,I rate this film highly, a very enjoyable film that I am sure will get many good reviews,with no fear of competition from films of a similar content.
3 out of 4 members found this review helpful.
An interesting historical drama that nevertheless lacks originality
- The Wind That Shakes the Barley review by Philip in Paradiso
In County Cork, in Ireland under British rule, in 1920, Damien O'Donovan (Cillian Murphy) has decided to leave his native village in order to practise medicine in a hospital in London. For his part, his brother Teddy is involved in Ireland's struggle for independence from Britain: he is the commander of the local flying column of the Irish Republican Army (IRA). Events decide Damien to join his brother, Teddy, and the film shows their involvement in armed operations against the British security forces. The film shows what happened when, after the Anglo-Irish Treaty (1921), which established the Irish Free State as a British Dominion and led to the partition of Ireland, some of the anti-British fighters accepted it, while others rejected it: the Irish war of independence turned into a civil war (1922-1923) in Ireland itself.
The movie is very much a historical drama following a linear narrative. Ken Loach being who he is, the film intends to show that the British occupation of Ireland was a savage and ruthless colonial enterprise - and no doubt, in many ways, it was: the ultra-violent paramilitary forces, such as the Black and Tans, are shown in action in the film. The story is told from the standpoint of the IRA fighters. This is fine, but the movie does feel a bit demonstrative, didactic and predictable at times: somehow, it lacks originality. However, it is a convincing and well-made film. It seems to capture the atmosphere in Ireland in the 1920s very well. I enjoyed watching the movie, even though it may not be the masterpiece that some people claim it is. Somehow, the film is interesting and feels necessary.
1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.
Brothers in Arms
- The Wind That Shakes the Barley review by Steve
For this low budget Palm D'Or winner, Ken Loach adopts the Irish War of Independence (1919-21) as a vehicle for his own socialism. He portrays the IRA as divided between an elite who will merely replace British colonial rule, and the rebel-heroes intent on creating a more equal and free society.
As the fight for autonomy mutates into civil war, two brothers (Cillian Murphy, Pádraic Delaney) must take opposite sides in the struggle for the soul of the Republic. With horrifying consequences. This is strikingly photographed on location in County Cork in the customary Loach style, with native songs and a homespun production design.
So the IRA are all local Irish actors, and aside from the leads, mostly non professionals. IMDB says the British army was cast from ex-soldiers who were asked to improvise. Miscues were not reshot. This feels raw and spontaneous, rather than heritage cinema. The political lessons are converted into scenes of unconvincing dialogue.
The story is not well told, and some pre-knowledge is an advantage. Its scope is limited to the soldiers in the field rather than the politicians, so the wider picture is rarely seen. It's probably more of interest to students of the director than those of Irish history though its representation of colonial rule is a useful head reset for UK patriots
0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.
Awful film
- The Wind That Shakes the Barley review by VC
I can't believe this film got awards and brilliant professional reviews! I wonder if the director had been an unknown rather than Ken Loach if the reviews would have been so positive? The film was entirely fictional so if you want to understand the Irish rebellions etc it will be no use at all. I couldn't understand the dialogue as it was mumbled throughout. There were lots of things I couldn't understand because I know nothing of the history really, and for example, references to what I thought were "forecourts" in fact meant "Four Courts" and there were many other instances! The film seems to think you already know everything. I didn't think the acting was very good either. It didn't grip me at all and I couldn't wait for him to get executed!
0 out of 1 members found this review helpful.