I haven't seen this on any format other than video, so to see it on DVD was a real treat. I had never before heard Clarice mutter "Bill..." under her breath when she first views his handiwork - every bit as iconic as Will Graham's realisation that "it's just you and I now, sport" in prequel Manhunter.
Another enhancement was the distant wind blowing through the obscene ballroom where she tells Hannibal, played by a near-best Anthony Hopkins hamming i up as "pure psychopath" and confident Lecter. Basically, it was nice to see it again.
Because it's genius, or near genius. It's gripping, runs a taught detective thriller alongside the most stirring of psychological interaction between two of the three leads, horrific - the fact that the mess of gore in Buffalo Bill's basement viewed just before the lights go out doesn't even make the top five most memorable moments from this dyed-in-the-wool horror story tells its own story - and it doesn't patronise. Must see cinema. Violent, stirring, clever, even when it tips over into melodrama.
One of the defining films of the 1990s, adapted from a unique and compelling novel, it weaves together crime thriller and gothic horror conventions to create a really distinctive variation on the cinematic portrayal of serial killers. The narrative entwines a whodunnit and a police procedural story with a modernising use of sexual politics in the heroine and her relationship with the men around her. A surprise winner of the Best Picture Oscar it remains a clever and highly entertaining film. Jodie Foster plays FBI trainee Clarice Starling who is sent to interview the incarcerated psychopath, Hannibal Lecter (Anthony Hopkins) ostensibly as part of some research but really because it is suspected he has information on the identity of a serial killer known as Buffalo Bill (Ted Levine) who has been murdering and skinning his women victims for reasons unknown. Starling manages against the odds to create a rapport with Lecter which helps her begin to unravel the Buffalo Bill case. Tightly edited this story is propelled along at a great pace and the characters are all brilliantly drawn. It is a disturbing story but the actual shocking events are mostly committed off screen although the after effects are shown. This follows a lot of classic story telling tropes but in an exciting and compelling way, for instance the hunt through the labyrinth of the killer's basement in the films climax that utilises the Greek myth of Theseus and the Minotaur. This is still a highly impressive film and certainly worth a revisit if its been awhile since you've watched it and if it's passed you by then I strongly recommend it.
It is difficult to convey what a massive film this was on its release. It transformed second-billed Anthony Hopkins from a highly respected and well-known actor into an international superstar, caused a degree of controversy and cemented Jodie Foster’s reputation as a major talent. Both won awards for this, and the film won several others.
It isn’t difficult to see why. Starling’s (Foster) initial meeting with Lector (Hopkins) has a tremendous build up – tales of Lector’s legendary brutality, warnings and a corridor full of inmates leering (and worse) at Starling as she makes her way to his cell. The following scene alternately fills the screen with first Hopkins’ face and then Foster’, and – considering they are really explaining the plot to the audience - is electrifying.
Starling’s isolation in her male-dominated job is nicely conveyed visually (without over-labouring the point) often simply by featuring her in scenes with men a lot taller than her. Her wilful lack of vulnerability ensures we are instantly on her side. When we meet Lector, such is his beguiling magnificence, we find ourselves on his side too. A dilemma for the audience, but a fascinating one.
Among this terrific cast, it would be an error to overlook the contribution of Ted Levine as Buffalo Bill. His perversion is told to us at first, and revealed slowly thereafter, culminating in a scene in which he hides his penis between his legs and displays himself as a vision of what he believes to be divine beauty. Much of the original novel’s detail regarding Bill has not been included in the film (how much more shocking – perhaps too shocking – it would have been to see him wearing one of his skinned female victim’s breasts, as in Thomas Harris’s story). And yet he still emerges as a deranged and frightening figure.
The double twist towards the end of SPOILER (a) Lector’s ingenious escape, and (b) the realisation that Starling’s back-up team have gone to the wrong house leaving her to face Bill alone, are perfectly handled. And yet for such a controversial film, there is little gore actually in it – it is the implied violence and Lector’s relish in it that shreds the nerves. ‘Silence of the Lambs’ is thoroughly deserving of its acclaim.