







Gloria might throw you if you’re used to Cassavetes’ usual rough-and-ready style—this studio outing is suprisingly polished, almost slick by his standards. But once you adjust, there's a lot to admire.
Gena Rowlands is phenomenal, playing Gloria, fierce, multi-layered and strangely tender. It's a role that could've gone cartoonish, but she grounds it in something real. The plot—a woman protecting a kid from the mob—leans toward thriller territory, but there's Cassavete's usual warmth and melancholy just under the surface.
It's not Cassavetes' deepest work, but it's one of his most accessible, and Rowlands is, as ever, the beating heart of it.
Years ago I watched Gloria because I am a big Gena Rowlands fan. Seeing it again I was astonished by the young boy John Adames who played Phil. He turned in a mesmerising performance. The direction of him was perfect. His acting was as good as any of our top actors. He was heartbreakingly good. The reviews when the movie was released were horrid and cruel and totally wrong. The young boy was mocked and his performance was deemed terrible. How wrong they were. As a result, John Adames never acted again. He was perfect for the role and his acting was as good as it gets. What a loss that his career ended. I recommend watching this closely to absorb the power of his performance and how well he and Gena Rowlands worked together.
John Cassavetes may not have directed many full length movies but they always impress me , especially when Gena Rowlands is one of main cast as with Gloria
Equally impressive in Gloria is child actor John Adames , in my view
However , some of the reviews of his performance were so extremely negative that John Adames decided to retire from the acting profession
I think this is a real shame because great performances could have followed Gloria
When I think of fine actors who have a number of prize turkeys on their cv as well as celebrated gems - Bill Nighy and John Hurt spring to mind - I feel John Adames was unfairly treated