Amazing this is made in 1936. That means HG Wells himself visited the set! he died in 1946. Tbh this is based on one of his later, weaker novels.
More a curiosity piece now, the acting very stagey. The theme of the future being the destruction of civilisation and a return to a feudal farming system is not new, and has been used many times since in novels and movies, from Planet of the Apes and more. The Second Sleep novel by Robert Harris and in a way, Harvest by Jim Crace (which SHOULD have won the 2013 Booker prize). So many examples. All the post-nuclear war movies for a start.
Fascinating really the visions of a future with dates on screen, 1940, 1945, 1966/7, 1970 and 2036. And of course there are flying cars or similar - as ever in visions of the future!
In 1936 when the film was made, Fascist rule in Italy was over 12 years old and 3 years old in Germany, so HG Wells used that source material and details of USSR maybe, though Stalin's crimes were yet to be exposed.
One for fans only but an important British scifi film nonetheless. Watch with Fritz Lang's silent masterpieces like Metropolis and more.
It was better than I expected considering it was made in 1936. Unfortunately the sound quality was less than perfect, so much of the ideas behind it were lost to me.
Landmark science fiction behemoth adapted by HG Wells from his own novel, which looks into the next hundred years. It's significant that the director was usually an art director because the most memorable aspects of the film are the extraordinary, huge sets of the cities of the future. The oratorical acting of the cast is of lesser interest.
Wells goes straight into the blitz, and then predicts a long period of continual warfare and the breakdown of civilisation brought on by diseases triggered by biological weapons. Mankind regresses into another dark age. This is the most interesting part of the film, and anticipates the dystopia of post nuclear films.
Tribal warfare is eventually replaced by a new scientific order of democracy and equality, which is never entirely free of superstition. The actors exchange long editorials which are sometimes interesting, but not very cinematic. Perhaps Wells might have collaborated with an experienced screenwriter, but these oddities are part of the attraction.
Though the film is long winded, Alexander Korda's production is never less than magnificent, including the rousing score by Arthur Bliss. The vision is pessimistic, which is understandable in a country sliding into another major war. But the story ends with humans about to explore space, and the possibility of a brave new world in the stars.