Emma Stone is phenomemal
- Poor Things review by PT
If your a fan of Yorgos Lanthimos and his unconventional films, this one is the auteur director at the top of his game. Amazing production sets add to the fantasy feel of the film. It is a funny, wacky , sexy , dramatic and off the wall masterpiece.
Dafoe and Ruffalo are superb, especially the latter who is like a cad from the old British Ealing comedies. Emma Stone on recieving her Oscar for the role thanked Yorgos for the role of a lifetime as Bella Baxter. It really is a consummate performance from her , playing a number of roles in one character on her journey in growing into her body age throughout the film. Her acting is a pleasure to witness. Her performance really is a wow experience.
3 out of 7 members found this review helpful.
Poor me
- Poor Things review by cr
I knew that this was going to be weird after reading all the reviews which were all positive but here comes the but...
Not that weird!
I wasnt a fan of the favourite which is this directors previous film and was similar in its over rated reception.
This is nearly 2.5 hours of oddness dressed up in emanciptation with the result being its virtually critic proof. My main problem, same as the favourite, is the annoying discordant background music which runs through the film.
I am sure a lot people have said they like it when they havent.
A real slog to sit through i mostly hit the fast forward button.
But emma is good it looks amazing and its unique. If you like this director you may like it.
Not recommended.
3 out of 6 members found this review helpful.
Pretty, but far too long
- Poor Things review by DM
The book is ambiguous (we don't know if Bella is really a Frankensteinian creature) and set in the real world. The movie is unambiguous, linear, and set in a steampunk world, or a kind of cosplayers' 19th century, that makes you wonder what is supposed to be fantastic and what people accept as normal. It's quite similar to 1960s "hip" picaresque movies, the only difference being that it's a young woman going through sexual experimentation rather than a young man. You get the point of each sequence long before the director thinks you have. The one point I thought there was a plot twist coming (this is a world in which brains can be transplanted, after all) it fails to happen, probably because the scriptwriter didn't think of it. So: read the novel instead.
1 out of 2 members found this review helpful.
Life of Brain
- Poor Things review by CH
Earlier reviews here, as elsewhere, show that this is a film which divides opinion.
And so, I come to this from a different angle (and it is a film which use a fish-eye lens many times). From scene to scene it is engaging, fascinating, outlandish and all the other adjectives which can be applied to this magic-realist take on late-nineteetn-century scientific experiment run riot. And yet, do these cohere into as satisfying a film as it could be?
For all this, it is opulently staged in its various cities and abroard ship, so much so that one might be distracted from the narrative into applauding the scenery - and wondering whether there has been a spraying from the cgi device behind those involved (and the acting is often remarkable). It turns out that these real sets were created for it. As such, the film deserves to be seen on a large screen.
And one should celebrate its success at a time when the multiplexes have been swamped by endless sequences of the Marvel crowd and their ilk.
Small wonder that a first edition of Gray's novel - published three decades ago - commands a fair sum now.
1 out of 3 members found this review helpful.
Just awful - bloated, pretentious, pointless nonsense
- Poor Things review by PV
I almost turned this off after half an hour - and wish I had.
WHY on earth did it win awards? One can almost smell the massive budget on this massive bloated mess of a movie, which seems a real vanity project, set in some imagined past present steampunk age.
I hated it. Really.
And as for the Oscar winning Emma Stone - well I think the academy were voting for the STRONG-AND-INDEPENDENT-WOMAN character.
As someone who understands infant language acquisition, and linguistics and syntax, I can say whoever wrote this gets it ALL wrong. Really.
Just dross, like the same director';s awful THE LOBSTER too.
and NOT original at all - watch or read FRANKENSTEIN. or maybe read a Czech novel published 18 years before HG Wells The Time Machine called EINSTEIN'S BRAIN in which the scientists brain is transplanted into a dead soldier on a battlefield who then travels through time.
I am just baffled why anyone admires or enjoys pretentious dross like this. When I think how hard it is for people to get basic funding for a decent film, or get a novel published, while boring, pointless drivel like this wallows in ponds of riches. I give up.
0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.
A cinematic smorgasbord of delight
- Poor Things review by Alphaville
A surreal fantasy beautifully directed, quirkily shot and scored, opulently staged, funny, grotesque, raucous, outrageous and defiantly anti-snowflake (eat you heart out, Barbie), this is a scintillating riposte to the bland TV-fare that often passes for film these days. Weird and wonderful, with outrageous sex scenes and gorgeous set designs of a surreal Lisbon, Paris… all luxuriating in deep-focus detail that makes it a feast for the eye. Just watch it.
0 out of 1 members found this review helpful.