Saltburn (2023)

Interesting Mystery Drama - Saltburn review by GI

With subtle dark comedy touches this mystery drama set in 2006 but played like it's the 1930s is highly watchable and yet ultimately leaves you wishing it had something more to it. There will be the obvious links to Brideshead Revisited and similar such dramas and the denouement is pretty predictable although played out with some attempt at originality. Barry Keoghan takes the lead role here (to me he seemed a little too old for the part) as Oliver, a Liverpudlian lad who has obtained a scholarship to Oxford where he is a fish out of water and largely ignored by the other students. He becomes transfixed by Felix (Jacob Elordi), a rather beautiful aristocratic student, who is a magnet to others especially girls. Felix befriends Oliver much to the surprise and consternation of the fellow students and feeling sorry for Oliver invites him to spend the summer at the family's very large estate called Saltburn. Oliver arrives and there we meet the bizarre family of father (Richard E. Grant), mother and ex model (Rosamund Pike), Oliver's beautiful sister (Alison Oliver) and family friend (Carey Mulligan). Oliver gradually inveigles his way into the affections of the family but to what end? There's certainly some very bizarre events that take place as the various characters attract and mix together and Oliver's intentions are subtle and mysterious. The film does feel very drawn out at times and there are plot holes that you have to fill yourself yet the cast are all impeccable in particular Pike and Grant. Overall this is interesting, at times clever with a solemnity and seriousness that combines with the dark comedic moments some of which might make you cringe but it also feels like a film a little uncertain of itself.

A loathsome, smug, smarmy & disgustingly conceited film, which was literally unwatchable - Saltburn review by Timmy B

In December 2020, Emerald Fennell wrote & directed Promising Young Woman. It is important to contextualise this film's impact was as much to do with the world's state of mind, being released in the thick of the Covid pandemic, as it was the quality of the film itself. I mention #MeToo deliberately, as there was significant traction pre-pandemic, which then exploded during it, with multiple examples of violence towards women being exacerbated due to lockdowns. My point here is that Promising Young Woman captured that, which was a big reason for it's success. And I gave it 4 stars in my review, despite some reservations I had.

But what Ms Fennell has done to follow this is to make one of the most clichéd, lazy & antagonistic films you could possibly imagine. For me, it was unwatchable, so much so that I switched it off after 30 minutes. Saltburn looks at the class system, also adding LGBTQIA into the mix. But the way that this film has been written is just atrocious.

The best way I can describe it is to use an example from the polar opposite of it's class critique. In Little Britain, there is a character called Vicky Pollard. She is written as an extremely aggressive, unpleasant, lazy & feckless chav. She is literally a satirisation of the most extreme elements of the working class, turned up to 11. But she is also a part of a comedy show that has many other stereotypes, in a comedy series which unashamedly wears it's overblown characters on its sleeve. Nobody, unless they were either stupid or totally disingenuous, would claim that Pollard represented all of the working classes.

Now flip that example around, so that it is looking at the "upper classes," make pretty much every single character that you encounter (within the 30 minutes that I could tolerate it) a walking clichéd stereotype of disgusting wealth, and because subtlety is not something which seems to exist for Ms Fennell, make every single actor mug horribly to accentuate these traits as much as possible.

But what I loathe & despise most about this film is the sheer laziness of the writing. At one point, about 20 minutes in, I paused it when one obnoxious character walked up to the protagonist to say something, then predicted exactly what he was going to say. I then pressed play & around 90% of it was dead-on. Every character says exactly what you'd expect them to say, in exactly the way you'd expect them to say it.

And the level of smugness of the writing just vomits out of the screen. This film not only loves this world it has created, it thinks it is cutting edge & genre-defining. And on the point of laziness, don't for a second think that I hate this film because of it's targeting of the upper classes. I would detest this film just as much if it was the working classes in its crosshairs. What I most object to is the fact that it's idea of satire is to look at a particular group, find the stereotypes & then just exacerbate those to an idiotic degree.

You only have to look at American Psycho for a masterful deconstruction of the privileged, even though that film is set in America. One irony about it, which would be too subtle for Saltburn to notice, is how Patrick Bateman at times actively adopts & mocks the other members of this class that he is trying to fit into, but this is part of the satire of the script, brilliantly written by Mary Harron & Guinevere Turner.

Saltburn is literally unwatchable, unbearable & vapid. It is a film which had a large number of critics falling over themselves to praise & revere. I actively hated & despised it, as much for its smugness as its script.

Ironically, I watched this the same day as Pig Killer, another rancid film (and one which I have also reviewed.) And my friend who I saw both with later pointed out that I enjoyed Pig Killer more. That's the level we are talking about.

Avoid

Deeply Derivative Film, Riddled with Plot-Holes, Misandrist in Parts, All Style over Substance. - Saltburn review by PV

I had heard about this film, with - usually - younger women oohing and ah-ing about how sexually explicit and debauched it is. The thing is, it is not. I've seen more explicit sex scenes in mild TV drama.

I do not think I have seen so many plot-holes in many films though. At several points I though 'YES BUT WHY DOES HE NOT JUST...etc'. or 'HOW DID HE/SHE NOT NOTICE...etc'. It gets annoying.

Locations chosen for the look, the style, with set pieces to please the eye. This is FLUFF therefore. It's a bit like an episode of Midsomer Murders really in so many ways - lack of logic for a start. Although no police seem to exist in this fantasy world...no DNA testing...no CCTV...no logic... It was filmed at Drayton House in Northamptonshire, privately owned though open for visits, by upper class aristocrat mates of the poshogirl director, no doubt.

Also it is deeply derivative - THE TALENT MR RIPLEY is the base for the writer I think and BRIDESHEAD REVISITED. It's filmed in HERTFORD COLLEGE where the classic 1981 ITV series was filmed too (watch that, not the tedious later movie - the novel is NOT about a love triangle at all). Watch those films and not this dross.

The writer/director Emerald Fennell is a deeply posh entitled upper-class rich kid who got to play with film as an actress the director, funded by the #metoo craze.

I have noticed that in recent years there are a lot of films, by both male and female directors, which shod full frontal male nudity but no doubt deliberately show no female full frontal nudity. Such hypocrisy. Esp re the end dance scene here - I would slice that all off, the last 10 minutes, like the misandrist flab it is.

The equal and opposite rule applies. SO if a male director got his pretty female star to gratuitously prance and dance around naked in a film, while having no male nudity, what would he be called? A misogynist? The male gaze? A pervert even? Exploitative? Yes, all that. The sisters would soon be screeching and shrieking about it. SO WHY is it OK for a female director to do this? Well?

I am no prude but THIS nudity is gratuitous, as well as deeply misandrist, sexist and unequal. I am fine with nudity and sex scenes when the story demands it.

Also, why do films and TV drama do this with a song and dance number to end? Is it Bollywood influence? Dr Who Beatles episode did it, badly. MEDUSA DELUXE too. Why? STOP IT! This is not Summer Season from Scarborough!

It is watchable. And I do like Barry Keoghan as an actor THOUGH he'd maybe too old for the character here.

BUT it is really very badly-written, full of trite lines and cliches, and cartoon character aristocrats. So yes we know some upper-class toffs are nuts, just read history, and sexually incontinent too often, and that includes straight and gay sex. SO watch a DECENT depiction of that, in the 1981 ITV drama BRIDESHEAD REVISITS then.

2 stars