Loved it. John Malkovich is very convincing as director of the silent movie who will do ANYTHING to get his film made, even sacrificing his actors. Willem Dafoe is brilliant as the vampire pretending that he is an actor playing the part of Count Orlok. Eddie Izzard is marvellously campy as the young man trying to make a deal with the count. What contributed to the grand fun was that it seemed as though the actors were throughly enjoying their roles. The “business” of Count Orlok - hissing, smearing, clicking his nails, sucking in his breath - were perfect. Dafoe nailed the role. Campy, compellingly, delightfully fun.
A clever idea doesn’t always make for a compelling film. Shadow of the Vampire spins a juicy premise—what if Max Schreck really was a vampire?—into a self-aware behind-the-scenes riff on Nosferatu. It’s bold, it’s arch… and unfortunately, it runs out of bit long before the lights come up.
The concept starts strong but quickly sags. The satire—of moviemaking, obsession, and method acting taken to, bloodthirsty extremes—feels like a one-joke sketch padded out to feature length. Once you’ve clocked the gag, there’s not much left to discover.
That said, Willem Dafoe is the reason to watch. Hidden under layers of prosthetics, he give Schreck a twitchy, reptilian charm—equal parts menace and pathos. He’s funny, creepy, and oddly touching, even as the rest of the film flounders around him.
Atmospheric but slight, Shadow of the Vampire promises a feast and delivers a curio—sharp teeth, but not much meat.
EXCELLENT ACTING,SET IN 190S,SILENT FILM,ERA. SUPPOSSED BE BEHIND SCENCES MADE FILM OF NOSFRERATU(LOOKS BIT LIKE IDS).KLAUS KLINSKI & OTHERS DO EXCELLENT JOB.BUT FOUND IT SLOW UNEVENTFUL.PREMISE IS ACTOR PLAYING A VAMPIRE IS A REAL VAMPIRE-