Funny, amusing, enjoyable, don't take it too seriously
- Hail, Caesar! review by JR
I have seen some of the other reviews on CP on this film, and they are entirely reasonable. For me it depends on the mood you are in when you want the film and what you hope to achieve by watching it.
It was silly, but very amusing and beautifully made and filmed with good performances. Certainly not as likeable, or as throughtful as other Coen Brother's film, as say Inside Lleweyn Davis. But that said, I watched this on a Sunday afternoon, and it was indeed the perfect Sunday afternoon film. You didn't need to engage your mind too much, but neither did the humour in the film negate being thoughtful about it.
As I mentioned, it's a film beautifully shot, with the set pieces impeccably designed. The dialogue is amusing and the characters great.
Just don't expect too much from it, enjoy it for what it is, and view it as the Coen Brothers having fun and poking fun at Hollywood and you won't be disappointed. It's well worth watching it, and definitely better (way better) than a two star film.
6 out of 6 members found this review helpful.
Infamy! Infamy! They've all got it in for me!
- Hail, Caesar! review by Count Otto Black
I used to like the Coen brothers. I really, truly did. But increasingly they're coasting on a wave of their past glories before splattering messily on the polluted beach of shameless self-indulgence. It's true that Hollywood movies made over 60 years ago look dated today. That's kind of inevitable, and not in itself funny. It's also true that some of them starred actors who weren't terribly good, but were massively hyped at the time for commercial reasons. Portraying movies from this period as terribly dated and their stars as talentless idiots who are literally at least borderline retarded is a cheap trick just about good enough to carry a five-minute sketch aimed at people old enough to remember where it's coming from. This is a feature-length comedy containing maybe three halfway decent jokes, the best and most relevant of which you won't get unless you remember John Wayne's 10-second cameo in "The Greatest Story Ever Told". Which, since it wasn't meant to be funny, ended up being a lot funnier than this entire movie (catch it on YouTube - it'll take you about as long to find it and watch it as it will to load this disk).
Is it hilarious that sailors in a spoof fifties musical sing about their yearning for women while dancing with each other, and it ends up looking more than a bit unintentionally gay? Perhaps, but if you think that's funny, you might as well watch the "Nothing Like a Dame" sequence from "South Pacific" this scene is directly based on, which has been mercilessly parodied for that very reason since long before most of you were born. Is it hilarious that big stars such as George Clooney play unlikeable characters with the IQ of live yoghurt? No, unless they actually get funny lines (which they don't), instead of plodding through the same tired schtick their buddies the Coens resort to every time they run out of ideas.
This film has almost no plot, and coasts along on the notions that the past was automatically funny because the people in it were more primitive than you, and deliberate bad acting is an adequate substitute for actual comedy. I'm not saying those Coens aren't talented, because they obviously used to be. I'm just saying that, on their recent form, this looks like the beginning of the end. Or possibly the middle of it. Seriously, Joel & Ethan, one more film like this and your careers are in trouble. Two, maybe three at the most, and your careers are over. And maybe it's about time.
4 out of 9 members found this review helpful.
Hilarious pastiche from the Cohen Brothers
- Hail, Caesar! review by FM
This had received so-so reviews so I wasn't expecting much, but found it to be a hilarious pastiche of the absurdities of 1940s/1950s movie making - I particular enjoyed the boardroom scene with the rabbi, priest and minister arguing over the Trinity, the audience over-reaction to the blonde Jesus, the send-up of Esther Williams movies and nautical musicals: Channing Tatum was the deal person to invoke memories of Gene Kelly. Definitely channelling a bit of Wes Anderson here. If you are in need of cheering up (and I was) give it a go.
1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.
Thumbs Neutral
- Hail, Caesar! review by MD
I could not decide whether to give this film the thumbs up or thumbs down its title suggested, hence my own review title. The central idea of focusing on a big Hollywood "fixer" around which to build a movie that is both a homage to Hollywood's past and a critical spoof of some of its more famous productions seemed reasonable enough, but what resulted was a very mixed bag.
The script was far too variable, sometimes witty and enlightening, sometimes plain daft, and a stupid plot about communists in the system just never clicked, but individual performances and scenes were pretty good. Josh Brolin appeared as if out of nowhere to give a solid performance in the lead role, and Alden Ehrenreich looks a real find - it's damn difficult to give a convincing portrayal of bad acting, but he did it with charm and aplomb.
Some individual set pieces, such as the sailors in the bar dance routine were clever and entertaining, and it gave you a bit of an insight into how Hollywood worked in its "heyday", so all in all it was worth watching, even if not one of the Coen brothers more memorable efforts.
1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.
A so-so, patchy Coen Brothers movie about making movies
- Hail, Caesar! review by PV
Film makers love making films about film makers. Maybe they think their lives are fascinating? Or just want to share in-jokes? Or get revenge against Hollywood enemies? Or just don't have the imagination to think outside of the Hollywood bubble (like writers always writing about writers)? Whichever is true (maybe they all are!), the results of this navel-gazing can be patchy, as they are here.
Probably best looked at a series of scenes and vignettes rather than a whole, there are certainly some funny moments and lines here - with unexpected turns and plot twists. And really some fantastic (and this expensive) sets which allows some wicked lampooning of 1950s movies, especially epics like Spartacus and those religious epics of the day. The film used and hammy acting is spot on.
An improbable plot about writers taking revenge against those who ripped them off will be funny and a wish fulfilment of many writers watching, I am sure.
Plenty of stars in this one, hamming it up - and some of the 1950s setting in a movie studio is spot-on too.
All in all, watchable but not nearly as funny as it thinks it is!
A footnote in the Coen Brothers collection really. 3 stars. Just.
1 out of 1 members found this review helpful.
Et Tu Coens
- Hail, Caesar! review by griggs
Hail, Caesar! wants to be many things—noir, satire, musical, historical epic—but ends up being none of them. It lurches between tones, never quite deciding what it is. The Coens clearly know their Hollywood history, but the in-jokes are so niche that it sometimes feels like eavesdropping on someone else's nostalgia. The film flits between oddball sketches and a central character who's somehow both central and utterly forgettable.
There are moments of undeniable brilliance—the tap-dancing sailors, Clooney's goofball Roman—but they don't quite add up to a satisfying whole. You keep expecting a grand revelation, and then... the credits. It's not their worst (looking at you, The Ladykillers), but it's easily their laziest. In comparison to other Hollywood-reverence films like Once Upon a Time in Hollywood or Babylon, this one feels like a half-hearted effort.
What stings most is knowing what the Coens are capable of. These are the minds behind Fargo and No Country for Old Men—films that dance between tones with elegance and purpose. Hail, Caesar! feels like a half-remembered dream of those triumphs, a jumbled scrapbook of better ideas that never coalesce. It should have been a love letter to cinema, but instead plays like a hastily written email. Watching such talent tread water, content to riff without reason, is a deep sadness. The film ends, not with a bang, but a shrug—and you're left wondering what could've been if they'd just cared a little more, and weren't so proud of all the insider jokes they had planted in the script.
1 out of 2 members found this review helpful.
They forgot the first rule of comedy
- Hail, Caesar! review by CP Customer
Eventually got around to watching this, after it came to the cinemas to good reviews.
Well, for me it was just a hollywood movie about hollywood. Meh. Do the movie makers really think that the inside workings of hollywood (daft as they might be) are really of interest to the rest of us? OK, it's meant to be a satire, but it's really not very satirical. Some actors are thick! Some can't act! Hiarious! No, not really.
Yes, there were some good performances in this, but it was really a waste of time. I found myself having lost interest after the first half hour or so. Stuck it to the end, but all that did for me was to convince me that the Coens had forgotten the first rule of comedy: it has to be funny. This wasn't.
Two stars only because the quality of some of the actors dragged it up from 1.
0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.
Enjoyable
- Hail, Caesar! review by PT
Okay this is not the greatest offering from the coen brothers, but I enjoyed it anyway. The storyline that runs through the film is the kidnap of actor Baird Whitlock , Clooney , who is very funny as this dim witted actor.
This loose storyline is used to look at the Hollywood of a bygone age. There are some great cameos by a number of stars. Ralph Fiennes is great as Lawrence Lawrence (the second name pronounced differently) a posh English director. Scarlett Johansson lights up the screen as DeeAnna Moran, definitely supposed to be Esther Williams, indeed the water sequence is reminiscent of Million Dollar Mermaid. She is brilliant as the innocent star in front of the cameras and a diva off. Film buffs might be interested to know though that the adoption plan for Moran's baby in the film is based on Loretta Young though, not Williams.
Also great performances from Swinton, Channing and Ehrenreich. I'm sure fans of the so called golden age will know who these actors are impersonating in an over the top , fun way.
All in all, enjoyable.
0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.
> [Less Than] Divine Comedy
- Hail, Caesar! review by AM
Set in the same fictional world as ‘Barton Fink’ (1991), ’Hail, Caesar!’ Is an amiable amble through the studio backlot, taking in the artificial worlds of each production, and the hopefully hilarious foibles of the Hollywood residents. Marketed as a laugh out loud comedy and with a cast stuffed with famous talented actors, the truth is somewhat different. Mind you, Coen comedy is a particular beast.
The film stages several set pieces in celebration of golden age Hollywood - a water spectacular with Scarlett Johannsen’s knocked up mermaid, a rollicking tap number featuring a closeted gay Communist dancer and a Roy Rogers Western. These sequences succeed on their own terms as spectacle, but they aren’t satirised or made comedic in any way and disrupt the film’s tempo. The showstoppers elbow aside the plot which then has to be delivered with straight-faced efficiency. The two funniest sequences show studio fixer Eddie Mannix seeking the approval of a panel of religious leaders for the studio’s Biblical epic ‘Hail, Caesar!’ and getting back what sounds suspiciously like internet reviewer snark. Then there’s debonair director Lawrence Laurenz struggling to mould Obie Doyle’s rodeo drawl into the dry muttering of drawing room farce. The latter was the centre piece of the trailers, but while they work on their own, they don’t build into a climax. Plus reading a description it comes over potentially much funnier than it actually is.
A gradual change in the brothers’ filmmaking may be to blame. Since ‘Fargo’, the Coens have developed an aesthetic based on space, stillness and eloquent silence, bracketed by moments of fierce action. This flowered in particular on ‘No Country For Old Men’. Contrast this with the omni-present and detailed soundtrack and whip tight editing of ‘Barton Fink’. The characters in ‘Barton Fink’ are intense and explosive like Warner Brothers cartoons, bouncing off the walls and hurtling into canyons. Lacking the nervous intensity of that film, ‘Hail Caesar!’ also lacks proper zingers, there are no lines that explode a laugh. Whitlock swapping Hollywood gossip with a communist’s lecture on dialectic should be hilarious, but the lines don’t land. The Coens seem reluctant to get their hands stuck into the dirty business of mining for laughs.
Another problem is that Mannix is really a dramatic character in a comedy story world. Calm and hard-boiled for most of the time, urbane and pleasant when he needs to be, Mannix is the still, silent hub around which the wheel of Capitol Pictures rotates. A comic lead is usually the most flawed and un-self aware person in the whole film: a walking catastrophe struggling uncomprehendingly against the forces of nature that trip him time and time again. Instead, Mannix is often just an observer of events, never really risking anything of his own to solve them. This breaking of the screenwriting convention that your main character must resolve the action seems to be a result of another Coen tradition: using characters as a greek chorus to observe human folly, whether that’s tragic or farcical. In Fargo, Marge Gundersson and her husband discuss police work before bed. Tommy Lee Jones’ Sherriff is usually a few steps behind the action in ‘No Country For Old Men’, shaking his head and pondering approaching mortality and the temporary insanity of greed that drives the characters. It’s the wrong approach for a knockabout comedy or screwball farce. There’s still a base line of quality filmmaking to be enjoyed here, but don’t expect to be rolling on the floor in fits of laughter.
0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.
Hugely enjoyable - great acting
- Hail, Caesar! review by CD
Don't be discouraged by some of the less than positive reviews. I have seen almost all the Coen Bros films and I rate this one highly. If you enjoy a nostalgic Hollywood theme with great acting from Brolin and Clooney in particular, then you should relish this.
I felt the pacing of the whole film was great and the communist interlude was a fun side plot which I felt worked well, and gave Clooney further chance to show what a great comic actor he is. Brolin's fixer character is really memorable - his speaking style reminds me a bit of Nick Nolte at times.
The locale is interesting, lovely views of the California coast and some great characters floating in and out. Overall fun for a relaxing weekend.
0 out of 0 members found this review helpful.