Blonde Bond'shell fails to deliver
- Quantum of Solace review by CS
Casino Royale was just what Bond needed, a fresh new interpretation, and casting Daniel Craig in the lead was inspiring. Bringing a whole new league of fans both male and female into the Bond fold. My 80 year old mother, who was already a fan of the Bond franchise, especially Sean Connery, was on the edge of her seat, enjoying the thrill of the ride in Casino Royale. A breath taking journey from start to finish.
So with the much eagerly awaited sequel, Quantum of Solace, what went wrong? From the start this is a badly directed, shoddily edited piece which is allover the place. The film is hard to follow, not because of the what is a very simplistic plot, but because the filming is all over the place. The action is virtually non-stop, but is so fast, that your eye doesn't have time to take anything in, editing is very choppy and as a result it is just all over the place. Daniel Craig, looks like he is bored and shows nowhere near the drive or enthusiasm he had in Casino Royale. The bad guy is dull and badly cast, he looks more like he should be presenting childrens TV, than in world domination. And whilst the rest of the cast try, they have nothing to work for.
Bond carved a niche with it's gadgets, technology, sexy girls, witty one-liners and of course suave lead actors. And of course no Bond film was complete without its main title song, one that actually had the film title as it's title or at least sung in the chorus. There hasn't been a decent Bond song in my opinion since Tina Turners 'Goldeneye' or Madonna's 'Die another day'. What have the last few songs been called or how did they go, haven't a clue! And this makes the films themselves less memorable.
I have not heard anyone, even die hard Bond fans say anything good about this film, this has done so much damage to the Bond future, so let's hope that the next one manages to salvage the remains from the ashes.
3 out of 5 members found this review helpful.